architect or design and build?
three ways to begin
most people building a considered home begin one of three ways: with an architect, with a builder, or with a design-and-build firm. each has real strengths.
the differences that matter most are when the price becomes certain, who leads the design, and who holds the whole project.
we've described each below, along with a fourth: an architect and a builder working together from the first sketch, which is how we work.
the pathways
architect first
the architect leads the design and documents it, and builders price it at tender. you have an independent design advocate throughout; the build price is known once the drawings are complete, and forecasts before then are indicative.
builder first
a builder is involved early, often alongside an architect through a negotiated tender, so the design can be shaped for a cost-effective build. the australian institute of architects describes early builder involvement as a recognised alternative to competitive tender.
design and build
one firm holds design and construction, giving a single point of responsibility. how far the design is led by an architect varies widely between firms.
architect and builder together
an independent practice, matched to you, designs the residence; we cost it as it's designed and build it. the practice leads the design, the builder prices it from the first sketch, and one party is responsible for the outcome.
how they compare
each pathway can produce an exceptional residence. the table sets out where they differ.
which suits you
if you already have an architect and drawings, appointed delivery builds the design as drawn. if you're starting with a site, the concept service begins with a practice matched to you and a concept costed as it's designed.
questions about choosing a pathway
should i hire an architect or a builder first?
it depends on what matters most early. if price certainty does, involving a builder early helps, and early builder involvement is a recognised alternative to tender. our pathway brings the architect and the builder together from the start.
is design and build cheaper than using an architect?
not necessarily. what changes is when cost is tested and who coordinates. in our pathway, design resolution is typically 8% to 10% of construction cost and covers architecture, interiors, landscape, engineering and consultants in one fee.
do we still get an architect-designed home?
yes. your residence is designed by an independent practice matched to you; we don't design it ourselves.
can we keep our own architect?
yes. through appointed delivery, we build their design as drawn.
begin with a concept
if your residence is still to be designed, it begins with the concept service: a practice matched to you, and a concept costed as it's designed.